demands state market shape colonial labor nineteenth century

How did the demands of the state and the market shape colonial labor in the nineteenth century?

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

journal article

Imperialism in World-System Perspective: Britain 1870-1914

International Studies Quarterly

Vol. 25, No. 1, World System Debates (Mar., 1981)

, pp. 43-68 (26 pages)

Published By: Wiley

//doi.org/10.2307/2600210

//www.jstor.org/stable/2600210

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $39.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal .
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Abstract

The origins of current world inequality are to be found in the nineteenth century, particularly in the period 1870-1914. The development of the world economy in this period is described, including the unique political-economic role of Great Britain within the world-system. A theory of imperialism based on the laissez-faire capitalist business cycle is developed which is intended to explain both British expansion and the accumulation of capital in the core, which is the single most salient feature of world inequality.

Journal Information

International Studies Quarterly, an official journal of the International Studies Association, seeks to acquaint a broad audience of readers with the best research being done in the variety of intellectual traditions included under the rubric of international studies. Therefore, the editors welcome all submissions addressing this community's theoretical, empirical, and normative concerns. First preference will continue to be given to articles that address and contribute to important disciplinary and interdisciplinary questions and controversies. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of International Studies Quarterly.

Publisher Information

Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
International Studies Quarterly © 1981 Oxford University Press
Request Permissions

In what way did colonial rule affect the working lives of colonial subjects?

In what way did colonial rule affect the working lives of colonial subjects? Artisans were unable to compete with cheaper merchandise produced in mechanized factories. What is "social Darwinism"? Which group eventually replaced traditional elites as the main group that European powers relied on to rule their colonies?

How did Ways of Working changing the parts of the world that came under European colonial rule in the 19th century?

How did ways of working change in the parts of the world that came under European colonial rule in the nineteenth century? More people worked on public projects for free. How did the emphasis on cash-crop agriculture in European colonies affect African and Asian farmers?

For what reasons did some colonized people choose to support European colonial regimes?

Why did some colonized people choose to support European Colonial regimes? - The hope that people would receive employment, status, and security in European led governance. - Opportunity for local elites to maintain earlier status and privileges while gaining considerable wealth working for colonial powers.

How did imperialism affect the economy of the colonies?

Imperialism adversely affected the colonies. Under foreign rule, native culture and industry were destroyed. Imported goods wiped out local craft industries. By using colonies as sources of raw materials and markets for manufactured goods, colonial powers held back the colonies from developing industries.

zusammenhängende Posts

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte