All AP US Government Resources Show Why could iron triangles be considered fundamentally detrimental to a democratic society? Possible Answers: It renders the impact of political accountability less substantial by ensuring that incumbents nearly always get reelected. It takes power away from the Judiciary and places too much power in the hands of the Legislative Branch. Too much power is wielded by the Judicial Branch at the sake of the Legislative and Executive Branches. It takes power away from the common people by negating the impact they are able to wield in senate elections. The general welfare and common good are forsaken so as to advance narrow and specific interests. Correct answer: The general welfare and common good are forsaken so as to advance narrow and specific interests.
Explanation: An Iron Triangle is when a bureaucratic agency, an interest group, and a congressional committee works together to advance its own agenda and act in its own interests. It is generally considered detrimental to a healthy democratic process because it ignores the interests of the common good for the sake of advancing specific and narrow interests. Which of the following is an example of an Iron Triangle? Possible Answers: Congress passing a new budget that expands funding for several Departments The Department of Education releasing a new policy that requires a higher Reading standard in public schools None of the answers are correct Congress increasing funding to the Department of Agriculture in exchange for lower regulations on corn production Monsanto donating money to conservative congressmen Correct answer: Congress increasing funding to the Department of Agriculture in exchange for lower regulations on corn production Explanation: Congress giving more funding to the Department of Agriculture (the bureaucracy) would expand the DoA's power base. In return, agricultural lobbying groups (special interests) would gain lower regulation for their constituents. Most likely, Congress would receive electoral funding promises for its efforts. This answer best represents all three point of the Iron Triangle. What are the possible concerns surrounding the Military-Industrial Complex? Possible Answers: It can lead to a misallocation of government resources It can hurt military self-sustainability It can cause unnecessary wars It encourages corruption All of these answers are correct Correct answer: All of these answers are correct Explanation: There are many concerns regarding the Military-Industrial Complex, including corrupting politicians, disproportionate military spending, an incentive to wage war on others, and private corporations gaining too much control over our ability to wage war. What about the Iron Triangle could be considered problematic? Possible Answers: None of these answers accurately reflect a potential downside of the Iron Triangle. It encourages a goal of cooperating for power instead of pursuing the public good It doesn't include the judiciary branch It increases communication between the legislative and executive branches It means corporations will be able to make higher profits Correct answer: It encourages a goal of cooperating for power instead of pursuing the public good Explanation: The biggest problem with the Iron Triangle is it encourages government agencies to pursue more power and funding instead of the public good. Oftentimes, the Iron Triangle will even result in sacrificing the public good in exchange for power, such as lowering environmental protections in exchange for oil money donations that don't benefit the public. What is a possible benefit of the Iron Triangle? Possible Answers: Increased cooperation can lead to more efficient policy change All of the answers are correct. Increasing the flow of political contributions makes for faster elections Decreasing the influence of interest groups on Congress None of the answers are correct. Correct answer: Increased cooperation can lead to more efficient policy change Explanation: The Iron Triangle establishes relationships between the most influential and informed groups in specific sectors affecting the nation. Improved communication between these groups can grease the wheels of policymaking and sometimes translate into a faster and cheaper public good. What is a possible benefit of the Military-Industrial Complex? Possible Answers: Decreased reliance on private funding for government projects Improved relations with other countries Improved economic growth during times of war A more efficient chain of command A second opinion on war strategy Correct answer: Improved economic growth during times of war Explanation: The economic stimulus of having the private sector produce tools of war is well documented. Many economists and historians believe that World War II is the real reason the Great Depression ever ended (instead of FDR's New Deal). None of the other options are considered a benefit of this system (in fact, most of them are drawbacks of the system). Which of the following is a modern day example of the Military-Industrial Complex? Possible Answers: None of these answers are correct The US has had the most military success of any country in history The US has the most advanced nuclear arsenal in the world The US accounts for almost half of the world's total military spending The US has the most efficient economy in the world Correct answer: The US accounts for almost half of the world's total military spending Explanation: The US has what many consider a ridiculously disproportionate military budget, which is at least partially a result of powerful defense group lobbying. Such spending has increased radically, since World War II, widely considered the beginning of the Military-Industrial Complex era. The "golden parachute" refers to what? Possible Answers: None of these answers is accurate. A backup measure placed in legislation in the event a project runs out of funding Depositing remaining campaign funds into one's personal account during a withdrawal from the race None of these answers are correct Demoting a revealed-as-corrupt politician to a cushy, less-public position instead of actually punishing he or she Correct answer: None of these answers are correct Explanation: While many of these answers sound plausible, the golden parachute generally refers to when a politician involved in an Iron Triangle is promised a well-paying job after his or her stay in government in exchange for political favors. This sometimes also works the other way, with government positions being awarded to generous lobbyists. The idea is that someone can "jump" from the public sector to the private and "settle" comfortably in financial terms. What could average citizens do to most effectively diminish the integrity of an Iron Triangle? Possible Answers: Organize protests against specific corporations None of these answers is correct. Petition the President to dismiss any executive officials that demonstrate signs of corruption Write letters to Congressmen requesting they stay away from interest groups Elect Congressmen with a convincing history of avoiding corruption and private influence Correct answer: Elect Congressmen with a convincing history of avoiding corruption and private influence Explanation: While the other options may have some effect, they're either unlikely to be effective or won't dismantle the entire Iron Triangle. Only electing politicians that will reject the influence of special interest groups may be a difficult task, but it would be most effective at reducing the power of an Iron Triangle. The principle here, is that the Iron Triangle is quite strong against external influences, and must change from the inside. The mutual cooperation between bureaucracy, Congress, and interest groups to expand power and forward interests is generally known as what? Possible Answers: The Iron Triangle None of the other answers are correct The Congressional Compromise The 3-Branch Dilemma The Military Industrial Complex Correct answer: The Iron Triangle Explanation: The Iron Triangle is used to describe the conspiratorial relationship between bureaucracies, congressional committees, and interest groups. These three points on the triangle often cooperate to further their own financial gains and interests. The Iron Triangle is often used negatively to describe actions that benefit these groups personally but don't benefit the general public (such as lowering regulations for interest groups and to save money for Congressmen). While the Military-Industrial Complex is often considered an example of an Iron Triangle, Iron Triangle is the best choice here. All AP US Government ResourcesHow does an issue network differ from an Iron Triangle?Issue networks are different from iron triangles because the former are temporary and ad hoc (a response to a particular issue) and are based on shared expertise, while the latter are more enduring and are based on common interest.
Which factor differentiates iron triangles from issues networks quizlet?issue networks involve a stable group of bureaucrats, legislators, and lobbyists, while iron triangles exclude lobbyists in an attempt to reach impartial decisions.
What is an Iron Triangle quizlet?The "Iron Triangle" The relationship between congress(especially Sub-Committees), Government agencies(Bureaucracy), and interest groups. This helps create policy in the United States and all 3 parts want to protect their own self interests. Interest Group.
What are the three parts of an Iron Triangle Inquizitive?An issue network includes interested individuals and activist who would not be part of a strict iron triangle. What are the three parts of an iron triangle?. Unsuccessful.. Infrequent.. Specific.. Broad.. |
In which of the following ways does an issue network differ from an iron triangle?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 WIKIFI Inc.
