Which of the following are problems or weaknesses with using a matrix structure for projects?

Defining is the first, in which the specifications of a project are defined, the project objectives are established, teams are formed, and responsibilities are assigned. Planning is the second stage, which the effort levels increase, plans are developed, deadlines are determined, and where the quality levels are maintained. Executing stage is third, and is where most of the project work takes place. Production, time, costs, specific measures are used to control the project. The fourth and final stage is Closing Stage, in which delivering the project to the customer, redeploying project resources happens, and going over a post-project review where lessons are learned and performance is assessed.
The executing stage is typically the most difficult, due to this is where a lot of planning can fall apart. You find out how your team can handle the project or if they can't. Making mistakes can be very costly and can hurt the project, as well as the team.

1. Defining: Project specifications objectives are defined, and teams are formed with major responsibilities assigned. Much of this is referred to as defining the Scope of a project.2. Planning: The creation of a comprehensive plan that includes schedules, budgets, staffing and risk assessment.3. Executing: Work begins, deliverables are produced, and progress is monitored.4. Closing: Putting the project to bed includes customer delivery, post project review or audit, and redeployment of project team.All things being equal, one would think that Closing would be the easiest phase to complete. However, there are times when this phase is the most problematic. Disagreements at the customer acceptance can lead to rework, tension and in many cases litigation. Veteran project managers' answer to this question would be "It all depends".

Sets with similar terms

Which of the following is a disadvantage of the matrix project structure?

One common disadvantage of the matrix structure can appear as confusion among managers who are involved with projects that are outlined by the matrix.

What is the weaknesses of matrix project organization theory?

Disadvantages of Matrix Structures Increases organizational complexity. Requirement for high degree of cooperation between functional and project management. Potential for conflicting management directives. Difficulty of establishing priorities suiting both functional and project management.

What is matrix weakness?

In weak matrix organizations, project managers have limited authority. Their role is part-time, and no administrative staff report to them. Their position is similar to a coordinator or an expediter. In a weak matrix structure, the functional manager controls the project budget.

What are some disadvantages in working in a matrix structure and why?

3 Disadvantages of a Matrix Organizational Structure.
Overlapping Teams = Lack of Clarity Around Roles and Responsibilities. A complex reporting structure can cause confusion around roles and responsibilities. ... .
Multiple Managers = Potential Conflict. ... .
More Information = Slower Decision-Making..