Which of the following correctly compares the impact of Centripetal forces at the local scale with the impact of Centripetal forces at the national scale?

journal article

Trade, People and Places: A Social Economic—Geographic Approach to Comparative Institutional Advantage

Review of Social Economy

Vol. 66, No. 4 (DECEMBER 2008)

, pp. 469-499 (31 pages)

Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

//www.jstor.org/stable/29770492

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Purchase article

$51.00 - Download now and later

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $51.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Abstract

This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of contemporary trade policies through a social economics lens. The paper offers a social economic critique of the theory of comparative advantage and the recently developed theory of comparative institutional advantage. Subsequently, the paper develops a more comprehensive and general theory of comparative institutional advantage consistent with the principles and methodology of social economics. Furthermore, it suggests ways in which this social economic—geographic version of the theory of comparative institutional advantage can be used in the construction of trade policies which are more likely to have a beneficial impact on the welfare of communities and to foster the fulfilling of human needs and potential. This version of the theory serves to reorient the focus of economic policy to the welfare of the community and the income-generating possibilities of trade. And it serves as a superior guide to policymaking because it is better able to define the root causes of regional success than standard trade theories.

Journal Information

For over sixty-five years, the Review of Social Economy has published high-quality peer-reviewed work on the many relationships between social values and economics.   The field of social economics discusses how the economy and social justice relate, and what this implies for economic theory and policy. Papers published range from conceptual work on aligning economic institutions and policies with given ethical principles, to theoretical representations of individual behaviour that allow for both self-interested and 'pro-social' motives, and to original empirical work on persistent social issues such as poverty, inequality, and discrimination.   In promoting discourse on social-economic themes, and unifying and invigorating scholarship around them, the journal is centrally concerned with these core research areas. The Review is a journal specialized in and a premier outlet for scholarly research at the intersection of social values and economics, and encourages researchers engaged in high-quality work in these areas. Implications for social programs and policies may be discussed in regular articles or in a Speakers' Corner contribution.   The Review provides a platform for established social-economics research, but also for research from other branches of economics and the social sciences, when the goal of developing better understandings of the role of social values in economic life is pursued.  

Publisher Information

Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Review of Social Economy © 2008 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Request Permissions

Which of the following compares the impact of increased global communications technology to the impact of state controlled media?

Which of the following compares the impact of increased global communications technology on the impact of state-controlled media? Both global communication technology and state-controlled media act as centripetal forces that present a common message, which is utilized by the government to bind citizens together.

How do you compare centripetal forces?

The radius (r) of this circle is equal to the mass (m) times the square of the velocity (v) divided by the centripetal force (F), or r = mv^2/F. The force can be calculated by simply rearranging the equation — F= mv^2/r.

How does the concept of centripetal forces apply at the state scale?

2 points: Centripetal forces unify a state (provide stability, strengthen, bind together, create solidarity) Centrifugal forces divide a state (lead to balkanization/devolution, disrupt internal order, destabilize, weaken).

Which of the following compares the impact of increased global communications technology quizlet?

Which of the following compares the impact of increased global communications technology to the impact of state-controlled media? Global communications technology may bring in new ideas that act as centrifugal forces, whereas state controlled media is utilized as a centripetal force to present a common message.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte