Why are the number of students classified as learning disabled has increased dramatically in recent years?

Review

. 1996 Spring;6(1):54-76.

Affiliations

  • PMID: 8689262

Review

Learning disabilities

G R Lyon. Future Child. 1996 Spring.

Abstract

Approximately 5% of all public school students are identified as having a learning disability (LD). LD is not a single disorder, but includes disabilities in any of seven areas related to reading, language, and mathematics. These separate types of learning disabilities frequently co-occur with one another and with social skill deficits and emotional or behavioral disorders. Most of the available information concerning learning disabilities relates to reading disabilities, and the majority of children with learning disabilities have their primary deficits in basic reading skills. An important part of the definition of LD is its exclusions: learning disabilities cannot be attributed primarily to mental retardation, emotional disturbance, cultural difference, or disadvantage. Thus, the concept of LD focuses on the notion of a discrepancy between a child's academic achievement and his or her apparent capacity to learn. Recent research indicates, however, that disability in basic reading skills is primarily caused by deficits in phonological awareness, which is independent of any achievement-capacity discrepancy. Deficits in phonological awareness can be identified in late kindergarten and first grade using inexpensive, straightforward testing protocol. Interventions have varying effectiveness, depending largely on the severity of the individual child's disability. The prevalence of learning disability identification has increased dramatically in the past 20 years. The "real" prevalence of LD is subject to much dispute because of the lack of an agreed-upon definition of LD with objective identification criteria. Some researchers have argued that the currently recognized 5% prevalence rate is inflated; others argue that LD is still underidentified. In fact, it appears that there are both sound and unsound reasons for the increase in identification rates. Sound reasons for the increase include better research, a broader definition of disability in reading, focusing on phonological awareness, and greater identification of girls with learning disabilities. Unsound reasons for the increase include broad and vague definitions of learning disability, financial incentives to identify students for special education, and inadequate preparation of teachers by colleges of education, leading to overreferral of students with any type of special need. There is no clear demarcation between students with normal reading abilities and those with mild reading disability. The majority of children with reading disabilities have relatively mild reading disabilities, with a smaller number having extreme reading disabilities. The longer children with disability in basic reading skills, at any level of severity, go without identification and intervention, the more difficult the task of remediation and the lower the rate of success. Children with extreme deficits in basic reading skills are much more difficult to remediate than children with mild or moderate deficits. It is unclear whether children in the most severe range can achieve age- and grade-approximate reading skills, even with normal intelligence and with intense, informed intervention provided over a protracted period of time. Children with severe learning disabilities are likely to manifest an increased number of and increased severity of social and behavioral deficits. When children with disabilities in reading also manifest attention deficit disorder, their reading deficits are typically exacerbated, more severe, and more resistant to intervention. While severe reading disorders are clearly a major concern, even mild deficits in reading skills are likely to portend significant difficulties in academic learning. These deficits, too, are worthy of early identification and intervention. Even children with relatively subtle linguistic and reading deficits require the expertise of a teacher who is well trained and informed about the relationships between language development and reading development.

Similar articles

  • Identification and assessment of students with disabilities.

    Reschly DJ. Reschly DJ. Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):40-53. Future Child. 1996. PMID: 8689261 Review.

  • Pre-academic and early academic achievement in children with velocardiofacial syndrome (del22q11.2) of borderline or normal intelligence.

    De Smedt B, Swillen A, Ghesquière P, Devriendt K, Fryns JP. De Smedt B, et al. Genet Couns. 2003;14(1):15-29. Genet Couns. 2003. PMID: 12725586

  • [Deficits in reading acquisition in primary school: cognitive, social and behavioral factors studied in a sample of 1062 children].

    Billard C, Fluss J, Ducot B, Bricout L, Richard G, Ecalle J, Magnan A, Warszawski J, Ziegler J. Billard C, et al. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2009 Jun;57(3):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.02.205. Epub 2009 Apr 24. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2009. PMID: 19398285 French.

  • Neuropsychological function in Tourette syndrome.

    Como PG. Como PG. Adv Neurol. 2001;85:103-11. Adv Neurol. 2001. PMID: 11530420 Review.

Cited by

  • Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Preschool Learning Skills Scale: A Tool for Early Identification of Preschoolers at Risk of Learning Disorder in Mainland China.

    Yao M, Wang J, Liu P, Guo Y, Xie Y, Zhang L, Su N, Li Y, Yu D, Hong Q, Chi X. Yao M, et al. Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 13;13:918163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918163. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35911917 Free PMC article.

  • The relation between the severity of reading disorder and visual functions among children with dyslexia.

    Darvishi A, Rad DS, Atigh SBQ, Hamidi A, Shandiz JH, Baghini AS. Darvishi A, et al. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 29;12(2):178-183. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_33_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 35813801 Free PMC article.

  • Amygdala sub-regional functional connectivity predicts anxiety in children with reading disorder.

    Davis K, Margolis AE, Thomas L, Huo Z, Marsh R. Davis K, et al. Dev Sci. 2018 Sep;21(5):e12631. doi: 10.1111/desc.12631. Epub 2017 Nov 15. Dev Sci. 2018. PMID: 29143475 Free PMC article.

  • Academic performance of undergraduate dental students with learning disabilities.

    Ali K, Zahra D, Coelho C, Jones G, Tredwin C. Ali K, et al. Br Dent J. 2017 Feb 10;222(3):205-208. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.125. Br Dent J. 2017. PMID: 28184079

  • Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for children with specific learning disorders.

    Tan ML, Ho JJ, Teh KH. Tan ML, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 28;9(9):CD009398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009398.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27678554 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  • Medical

    • Genetic Alliance
    • MedlinePlus Health Information
  • Research Materials

    • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program
  • Miscellaneous

    • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

Why is there an increase in learning disabilities?

This can be caused by things such as: the mother becoming ill in pregnancy. problems during the birth that stop enough oxygen getting to the brain. the unborn baby having some genes passed on from its parents that make having a learning disability more likely.

What are reasons the number of students classified as learning disabled has increased dramatically in recent years?

Unsound reasons for the increase include broad and vague definitions of learning disability, financial incentives to identify students for special education, and inadequate preparation of teachers by colleges of education, leading to overreferral of students with any type of special need.

What is the leading cause of learning disabilities?

Psychological trauma. Psychological trauma or abuse in early childhood may affect brain development and increase the risk of learning disorders. Physical trauma. Head injuries or nervous system infections might play a role in the development of learning disorders.

Are disabilities becoming more common?

The most common disability type, mobility, affects 1 in 7 adults. With age, disability becomes more common, affecting about 2 in 5 adults age 65 and older. “At some point in their lives, most people will either have a disability or know someone who has a one,” said Coleen Boyle, Ph.