Why did small scale settlements in southern Africa give way to larger states during the early nineteenth century?

journal article

Bilobial Dwellings: A Persistent Feature of Southern Tswana Settlements

Goodwin Series

No. 1, The Interpretation of Archaeological Evidence (Jun., 1972)

, pp. 54-64 (12 pages)

Published By: South African Archaeological Society

//doi.org/10.2307/3858093

//www.jstor.org/stable/3858093

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

• Access everything in the JPASS collection
• Read the full-text of every article
• Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep

$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

• Access everything in the JPASS collection
• Read the full-text of every article
• Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep

$199/year

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $14.00 USD.

How does it work?

1. Select the purchase option.
2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Journal Information

The Goodwin Series volumes are companions to the South African Archaeological Bulletin and are distributed to members of the South African Archaeological Society and the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists. The series began in 1972 in honour of the late Professor A J H Goodwin, the founder of the South African Archaeological Society and the first professional archaeologist in South Africa. Each of the nine issues published between 1972 and 2006 has a theme relating to the study of archaeology in sub-Saharan Africa, ranging from Quaternary Studies to Rock Art and Historical Archaeology. Individual issues are published at irregular intervals according to the availability of funds and interest expressed by prospective guest editors. All papers are peer-reviewed.

Publisher Information

From 1972 to 2005, the Goodwin Series was published by the South African Archaeological Society, a not-for-profit organization with a membership of between 900 and 1100 individuals and institutions worldwide. The Society operates from Cape Town. From mid-2005, the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA) was contracted to edit and produce the Society's academic publications for five years on behalf of the Society, which remains the owner. ASAPA is the professional association that represents the interests of archaeology and archaeologists throughout the SADC region (Angola, Botswana, DRC, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe). The editors of the Goodwin Series can be contacted at .

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Goodwin Series © 1972 South African Archaeological Society
Request Permissions

journal article

Plantations, Passes and Proletarians: Labour and the Colonial State in Nineteenth Century Natal

Journal of Southern African Studies

Vol. 13, No. 3 (Apr., 1987)

, pp. 372-399 (28 pages)

Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

//www.jstor.org/stable/2636388

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Purchase article

$49.00 - Download now and later

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $49.00 USD.

How does it work?

1. Select the purchase option.
2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Journal Information

Journal of Southern African Studies is an international publication for work of high academic quality. It aims to generate fresh scholarly inquiry and exposition in the fields of history, economics, sociology, demography, social anthropology, geography, administration, law, political science, international relations, literature and the natural sciences, in so far as they relate to the human condition. It represents a deliberate effort to draw together the various disciplines in social science and its allied fields. Southern Africa represents a unique opportunity for the study of a wide variety of social problems. The journal presents work, which reflects new theoretical approaches, and work, which discusses the methodological framework in general use by students of the area. The region covered embraces the following countries: the Republic of South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland; Angola and Mozambique; Zambia, Malawi, Zimbabwe; and occasionally, Zaire, Tanzania, Madagascar and Mauritius.

Publisher Information

Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Journal of Southern African Studies © 1987 Journal of Southern African Studies
Request Permissions

In what way did nineteenth century nationalist goals prove destructive in the twentieth century?

In what way did the peasants show their divergence from the Indian elite in the Great Rebellion of 1857?

What did Marx and Engels believe would be the outcome of the conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat quizlet?

What did the groups that led the 1848 revolutions in Europe have in common quizlet?