Do as directed explain the statement that India is a country with ancient culture?

Extract

It was the unanimous opinion of the early Orientalists of British India that India had no history, at least in the sense of historical writings. Like every consensus, it contained many variations of detail, as we shall see, but as the view of experts it was widely influential for a long time. For example, R. C. Majumdar gave a thoughtful version of this view at the beginning of the multivolume History and Culture of the Indian People (Majumdar 1951) by Indian scholars, published shortly after independence. But the consensus was eroded by the rise of what we may call the “colonial knowledge” paradigm, which asserted a close connection between European rule and European knowledge of India. It tended to discredit the old consensus and to lighten the specific gravity of Orientalist knowledge, simplifying it as an object of historical explanation. This development has cleared an opening, in recent decades, for a rush of new studies tending to create an opposing consensus, that India did have history of a kind, it being the task of scholars to explicate what kind, exactly, that was (for example, Pathak 1966; Warder 1972; Thapar 1992; Wagoner 1993; Ali, ed. 1999; Narayana Rao, Shulman, and Subrahmanyam 2001; Guha 2004; Mantena 2007). This in itself has been very much to the good, by reopening questions that had been closed by the old consensus. The old consensus itself, by contrast, was dismissed without much examination, and was attributed to colonial interest, cultural misunderstanding, or insufficient grasp of Indian languages and literatures. The old consensus now is seen as a simple ideological projection, easily explained and dismissed, with little complexity or interest for historical investigation. But this simplifying action of the prevailing paradigm renders invisible some of the very real effects of the old consensus, effects whose explanation can be very valuable to us. In order to gain the benefit it holds we have to take it seriously, trying both to explain it historically and to decide whether or in what way it is true.

References

Ali, Daud, ed. 1999. Invoking the Past: The Uses of History in South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berossus, . 1978. The Babylonaiaca of Berossus. Burstein, Stanley Mayer, ed. and trans. Sources from the Ancient Near East, vol. 1, f. 5. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar

Droit, Roger-Pol. 1989. L'Oublie de l'Inde: une amnésie philosphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1970. The ‘Village Community’ from Munro to Maine. In Religion/Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. Paris, The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 112–32. (Original version in Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 [1966]: 67–89).Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. 2005 [1949]. The Myth of the Eternal Return. Introduction by Jonathan, Z. Smith. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Engels, Friedrich. 1884. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats, in Anschluss an L. H. Morgan's Forschungen. Zurich: Hottingen.Google Scholar

Engels, Frederick [Friedrich]. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis. 1864. La cité antique, étude sur le culte, le droit, les institutions de la Grèce et de Rome. Paris: Durand.Google Scholar

Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis. 1980. The Ancient City, a Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome. Small, Willard, trans. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

GobineauJoseph Arthur, Comte de Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1853–1855. Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines. 4 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot Freres.Google Scholar

GobineauJoseph Arthur, Comte de Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1856. The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races, with Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind. Hotz, H., ed., with appendices by J. C. Nott, M.D. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. (Repr. New York and London: Garland, l984.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, Jacob. 1819. Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Guha, Sumit. 2004. Speaking Historically: The Changing Voices of Historical Narration in Western India, 1400–1900. American Historical Review 109: 1084–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G.W.F. 1970. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Hegel, G.W.F. 1975. Introduction: Reason in History. In Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Nisbet, H. B, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. Ca. 1782. Notes on the State of Virginia. N.p.: n.p.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language. (Repr. London: Times Books, 1983.)Google Scholar

Jones, William. 1788. The Third Anniversary Discourse, Delivered 2 February, 1786, by the President. (On the Hindus). Asiatic Researches 1: 415–31.Google Scholar

Lassen, Christan. 18471858. Indische Alterthumskunde. 4 vols. Bonn: H. B. Keonig; Leipzig: L. A. Kittler.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. 1871. Village-Communities in the East and West. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. 1875. Lectures in the Early History of Institutions. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. 1883. Dissertations on Early Law and Custom. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. 1970 [1861]. Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. 10th ed., with introduction and notes by Pollock, Frederick. Gloster, Mass.: Peter Smith.Google Scholar

Majumdar, R. C. 1951. History and Culture of the Indian People, vol. 1. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Mantena, Rama. The Question of History in Precolonial India. 2007. History and Theory 46: 396408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manu, . 2005. Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. Olivelle, Patrick, ed. and trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maurice, Thomas. 1793–1800. Indian Antiquities: Or, Dissertations, Relative to the Ancient Geographical Divisions, the Pure System of Primeval Theology, the Grand Code of Civil Laws, the Original Form of Government, and the Various and Profound Literature of Hindostan. 7 vols. London: the author.Google Scholar

Maurice, Thomas. 1822. Memoirs of the Author of Indian Antiquities. Part III. London: the author.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. H. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester: Sage and Brother.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. H. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 17. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Narayana Rao, V., Shulman, David, and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. 2001. Textures of Time: Writing History in South India 1600–1800. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar

Pallas, P. S. 17801789. Linguarum Totius Orbis Vocabularia Comparativa. 2 vols. St. Petersberg: Carl Schnoor.Google Scholar

Pargiter, F. E. 1962. The Purana Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age. 2d ed.Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.Google Scholar

Pathak, V. S. 1966. Ancient Historians of India: A Study in Historical Biographies. London: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar

Pingree, David. 1978. History of Mathematical Astronomy in India. In Gillispie, Charles Coulston, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 15, suppl. 1, 533633.Google Scholar

Rocher, Ludo and Rocher, Rosane. 1994–1995. The Puranarthaprakasa: Jones's Primary Source on Indian Chronology. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate & Research Institute 54–55: 4771. (Romanized Sanskrit text of the work.)Google Scholar

Thapar, Romila 1992. Interpreting Early India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 1992b. Indian Time, European Time. In Hughes, Diane Owen and Trautmann, Thomas R., eds., Time: Histories and Ethnologies. Ann Arbor: Comparative Studies in Society and History Book Series, University of Michigan Press, 167–97.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2006. Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2008. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. New ed. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2009. Riot over Ryotwar. In Trautmann, Thomas, ed., The Madras School of Orientalism: Producing Knowledge in Colonial South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 310–32.Google Scholar

Verbrugghe, Gerald P. and Wickersham, John M.. 1996. Berossos and Manetho, Introduced and Translated: Native Traditions in Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Wagoner, Phillip B. 1993. Tidings of the King: A Translation and Ethnohistorical Analysis of the Rayavacakamu. Honolulu: University of Hawaìi Press.Google Scholar

Warder, A. K. 1972. An Introduction to Indian Historiography. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar

Whitman, Walt. 1871. Passage to India. Washington, D.C.: J. C. Redford, for the author.Google Scholar

Whitman, Walt. 1982. Walt Whitman: Complete Poetry and Collected Prose. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar

Wilson, H. H. 1854 [1st ed. 1831]. An Introduction to Universal History, for the Use of Schools. 5th ed.Calcutta: Calcutta School Book Society.Google Scholar

What is the ancient culture of India?

The Harappa culture, also known as the Indus River Valley Civilization, were the ancient ancestors of modern-day India. As the Harappa culture melded with the Indo-Europeans, also known as Aryans, they adopted Vedism, the faith of the Aryans. This began the Vedic period in which the Harappan culture melded with Vedism.

Is a land of ancient culture explain the statement?

Answer: The culture of India refers collectively to the thousands of distinct and unique cultures of all religions and communities present in India. India's languages, religions, dance, music, architecture, food and customs differ from place to place within the country.

What is the importance of India in ancient period?

India was home to many religions such as Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism. They follow different social customs and speak several languages, but a similar style of life was found throughout the country. The entire Indian subcontinent was known as Bharatvarsha [name taken from ancient tribe India].

Is India a cultural country?

India is home to over a billion people, accommodating incredible cultural diversity between languages, geographic regions, religious traditions and social stratifications.