Show
1. Evaluate the following two statements as true or false. Justify your answer in one or two sentences. A.“Having pelvic spines is always advantageous to a stickleback.” FALSE. Pelvic spines provide an advantage in some environments but not others. One factor that appears to favor stickleback fish with pelvic spines is the presence of large-mouthed predatory fish, such as trout. Pelvic spines provide stickleback fish with a defense against such predators; however, pelvic spines appear to be a disadvantage in habitats without large-mouthed predatory fish and/or habitats with insects that can grab the spines, so that they can eat the fish. B. “All mutations are bad.” FALSE. A mutation is advantageous (favored), disadvantageous (not favored), or neutral (neither favored or not favored) depends first on whether the mutation affects a trait in the organism and next on whether that particular trait is selected for or against. The nature of the selective pressure depends on the environment the organism lives in. Some mutations that alter a trait, such as the loss of pelvic spines in freshwater stickleback fish, are advantageous in some freshwater environments but not all. 2) (Key Concept B) What specific features of the environment in Bear Paw Lake, Alaska, may have favored the survival and reproduction of stickleback fish with reduced pelvises? Answer in two or three sentences. The lack of large-mouthed predatory fish in Bear Paw Lake meant that stickleback fish both with and without pelvic spines could survive. Insects that live in Bear Paw Lake can grab stickleback spines to catch the fish and eat them, which may have favored the survival of stickleback fish with reduced or no pelvic spines. Although this is not mentioned in the film, students may note that more vegetation in freshwater lakes could also favor fish with less armor, as they could more easily dart into hiding places. 3) (Key Concept G) In the film, Dr. Bell notes that in multiple freshwater populations and at multiple times in history, the frequency of stickleback fish with pelvic spines decreased and the frequency of stickleback fish with reduced pelvises increased. This demonstrates that: a) only fish with smaller pelvises migrate to freshwater. b) similar environments select for similar genetic changes. c) the pelvis of the marine fish is destroyed by freshwater. 4) (Key Concepts A, B, and F) Circle whether each statement below is true or false. True/False Evolutionary change always takes millions of years. True/False Stickleback fish lose their pelvic spines whenever they are in fresh water. True/FalseDramatic changes in traits, such as the loss of limbs, can occur through mutations affecting a single gene. What did researchers discover about the genetic mutation causing the loss of pelvic spines?What did researchers discover about the genetic mutation causing the loss of pelvic spines? It is found in the coding region of the Pitx1 gene. It results in a protein that is no longer functional. It is always found in one of the regulatory "switches" near the coding region of the Pitx1 gene.
What is mutated in Pitx1 in freshwater sticklebacks?Mike Shapiro, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar and co-first author, found that a gene located at that region is the stickleback version of a gene in mice called Pitx1 that, when mutated, causes mice to have greatly reduced hind limbs. These mice often have asymmetric limb and pelvic reductions, much like the sticklebacks.
What happened to the Pitx1 pelvic switch in freshwater fish?A mutation in the pelvic switch shuts off the Pitx1 gene in the pelvis. This prevents the development of pelvic spines. 2. According to the film, what is the selective pressure that led to freshwater stickleback fish losing their pelvic spines?
What do you think might be an explanation for why Morvoro lake contains fish with and without pelvic spines?27. What do you think might be an explanation for why Morvoro Lake contains fish with and without pelvic spines? Answers will vary. It is possible that the population in Lake Morvoro is in the process of changing from a population of fish with mainly pelvic spines to one without pelvic spines, or vice versa.
|